Substance Dualism or Eliminativism
نویسنده
چکیده
Physicalism (P) entails minimal physicalism (MP), MP entails minimal supervenience (MS), and MS is the thesis that there is covariance between the supervenient and the subvenient stuff. Therefore, if the (alleged) supervenient and subvenient stuff do not covary, then MS is false, and if MS is false then MP is false, and if MP is false then P is false. Put differently: if MS is false then P is false—P stands and falls with MS. In this essay, I begin by showing what the minimal physicalist thesis is: MP is, essentially, MS. Next, I look at qualia and the trouble they pose to MS and hence MP: if it is possible that qualia can be inverted without a behavioral change, then it follows that MS, MP, and P are false. In other words, the possibility of inverted qualia show that P is false. Seeing that this possibility does not establish a very robust dualism, I turn to the issue of inverted selves: if inverted selves are possible, then full-blown substance dualism follows. I argue that inverted selves are possible. 1. Minimal Physicalism Minimal physicalism (MP) is the thesis that one is minimally committed to if one is a physicalist. This is not to say that this is the only thesis a physicalist holds, but if one is a physicalist, then one affirms MP. So a physicalist affirms MP plus other theses. This entails that if MP falls, then so does physicalism. Put differently: if MP is false, then physicalism (P) in all its forms is false. The converse, however, does not hold true: if P is shown to be false, it does not follow that MP is false, for MP does not entail commitment to P. For current purposes, it does not matter what we take P to be— perhaps P is the identity thesis or eliminative materialism—whatever it is, that is not relevant. So what is MP? Jaegwon Kim says that “[m]ind-body supervenience can usefully be thought of as defining minimal physicalism—that is, it is a shared minimum commitment of all positions that are properly called physicalist.” So MP is the thesis 1 13, Physicalism, Or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. Res Cogitans (2016) 7 Hendricks | 13 2155-4838 | commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans that the mind (i.e. mental states) supervenes on the body (i.e. physical states). But what is supervenience? Kim suggests that “covariance is the crucial component [of supervenience]; any supervenience concept must include this condition in some form” and covariance, Kim says, is the thesis that “[s]upervenient properties covary with their subvenient, or base, properties. In particular, indiscernibility in respect of the base properties entails indiscernibility in respect of the supervenient properties.” In other words, the minimal supervenience (MS) thesis is that the supervenient and subvenient properties (or stuff) covary: there is no difference in one kind without a difference in the other kind. We are now in position to define MP: MP necessarily entails MS, and MS is the thesis that the supervenient and the subvenient stuff covary. Thus, all that is needed to show that MP—and hence P—is false, is that it is possible that there be a change in one kind of stuff without there being a change in the other kind.
منابع مشابه
Consciousness and the Prospects for Substance Dualism
There has in recent years been a significant surge of interest in non-materialist accounts of the mind. Property dualists hold that all substances (concrete particulars that persist over time) are material, but mental properties are distinct from physical properties. Substance dualists maintain that the mind or person is a non-material substance. This article considers the prospects for substan...
متن کاملJoint winner of the 2013 Philosophy prize essay competition
This article aimstoreviewthe standardobjectionstodualismandtoargue that either they will fail to convince someone committed to dualism or are flawed on independent grounds. I begin by presenting the taxonomyofmetaphysical positions on concrete particulars as they relate to the dispute between materialists and dualists, and in particular substance dualism is defined. In the first section, severa...
متن کاملMeta-scientific Eliminativism: A Reconsideration of Chomsky’s Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior
The paper considers our ordinary mentalistic discourse in relation to what we should expect from any genuine science of the mind. A meta-scientific eliminativism is commended and distinguished from the more familiar eliminativism of Skinner and the Churchlands. Meta-scientific eliminativism views folk psychology qua folksy as unsuited to offer insight into the structure of cognition, although i...
متن کاملDualism of the Soul and the Body in the Philosophical System of Ibn Sīnā and Descartes
The problem of human's two domains has a significant influence on human knowledge, and since the human privilege in the universe to the other beings as well as the immateriality of the soul and so on is based on proving the soul's substance separately, it worths to search in this issue about the ideas of two Western and Islamic philosophers. Ibn Sīnā with arguments such as the "suspending man" ...
متن کاملWhy property dualists must reject substance physicalism
I argue that property dualists cannot hold that minds are physical substances. The focus of my discussion is a property dualism that takes qualia to be sui generis features of reality.
متن کامل